Legal Opinion
Ingersol v. Seattle-First National Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1963No. 36680PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for the conversion of a herd of cattle. General damages were also awarded for the loss of an alleged going dairy business.
In 1951, the plaintiff (respondent) Ingersol went to work for a Mr. Sharpe, first as a milker and later as a foreman, on a farm owned by Sharpe in Clallam County. They entered into a working arrangement whereby the plaintiff would receive $200 a month and, at times, board and room from Sharpe. The plaintiff testified that he “drew” only what he needed for his necessary living expenses; that the excess was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Wicklund v. AllraumWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Cunningham v. Town of TietonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Hole v. Unity Petroleum Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Schneller v. VincentWashington Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Worthington v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Farm Crop Energy, Inc. v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.