Legal Opinion

In Re Trexler

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1989No. 19-11207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the court is a motion filed by Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“movant”), seeking relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d) so that it may proceed to repossess certain personalty of the debtor. Because we find that movant is a secured creditor and has met its burden of proof under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(2), we grant Sear’s motion, thus enabling it to pursue its rights in the subject collateral under state law.

The parties have stipulated to the following facts, and hence, no hearing was held. On October 16,1986, debtor, Larry L. Trex-ler…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re MoodyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1986
  2. In Re SchwartzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  3. Breakiron v. Ward (In Re Breakiron)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Matter of OrecchioUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  5. In Re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re RiceBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Freeman (In Re Freeman)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991
  3. Northeastern Copy Services, Inc. v. Bridgeport Park Associates (In Re Northeastern Copy Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. In Re: Megan Rice V.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API