Legal Opinion

In Re Schwartz

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 17, 1982No. Bankruptcy 2-82-01124PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER DENYING APPLICATION AND MOTION UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)

DJ. KELLEHER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This case is before the Court for consideration of an Application to Avoid Lien and a Motion to Avoid Lien, both filed herein by counsel for the debtor ostensibly pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f). Both pleadings seek orders avoiding liens, the first addressed to a lien described as a “nonpurchase-money security interest” and the second addressed to a “judicial lien” which, according to debt- or’s counsel, are both held by Sears, Roebuck and Company [Sears].

Counsel for the debtor…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Matter of DixonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  3. Morelock v. All-Phase Electric Supply Co. (In Re Morelock)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
  4. In Re GreenhillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  5. In Re BlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API