In Re Schwartz
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER DENYING APPLICATION AND MOTION UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)
DJ. KELLEHER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case is before the Court for consideration of an Application to Avoid Lien and a Motion to Avoid Lien, both filed herein by counsel for the debtor ostensibly pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f). Both pleadings seek orders avoiding liens, the first addressed to a lien described as a “nonpurchase-money security interest” and the second addressed to a “judicial lien” which, according to debt- or’s counsel, are both held by Sears, Roebuck and Company [Sears].
Counsel for the debtor…
2Cited by10 opinions
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Matter of DixonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Morelock v. All-Phase Electric Supply Co. (In Re Morelock)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- In Re GreenhillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- In Re BlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.