Legal Opinion

In Re Tucker

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided January 19, 1984No. 19-30246PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

36 B.R. 706 (1984)

In re George Ray TUCKER, Jr., and Mary Lou Tucker, Debtors.

George Ray TUCKER, Jr., and Mary Lou Tucker, Plaintiffs,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. BK 83-40163.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois.

January 19, 1984.

Benjamin J. Vasta, Christopher, Ill., for debtors.

Michael Kimmel, Carbondale, Ill., for defendant, Sears.

ORDER

J.D. TRABUE, Bankruptcy Judge.

At East St. Louis, in said district, this matter having come before the Court pursuant to a motion to terminate the automatic stay filed on behalf of Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears), by its attorney,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Development Management Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Tucker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re HardageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
  2. In Re MoodyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1986
  3. Tandy Credit Corp. v. Martinez (In Re Martinez)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. In Re TrexlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. In re StanleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API