Legal Opinion

In Re Moody

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided May 30, 1986No. 17-12186PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID W. HOUSTON, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

On consideration of the motion seeking relief from the automatic stay filed by Sears, Roebuck and Company, hereinafter referred to as Sears; response to said motion filed by the Debtor, George Ellis Moody; all parties being represented by their respective attorneys of record; and the Court having heard and considered same, hereby finds as follows, to-wit:

I

The Court has jurisdiction of the parties to and the subject matter of this proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and 28 U.S.C. § 157. This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John Miller Supply Co. v. Western State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Babson Credit Plan, Inc. v. Cordele Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Costner's Furniture, Inc. v. Cawthorn (In Re Cawthorn)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1979
  4. Frankel v. Associates Financial Services Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. In Re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re HardageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
  2. In Re ZiluckDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
  3. In Re OszajcaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Tandy Credit Corp. v. Martinez (In Re Martinez)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  5. Dickason v. Marine National Bank of Naples, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API