Legal Opinion

Palomares Land Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1905No. L.A. No. 1590PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This suit was brought to recover money paid by plaintiff to respondent’s treasurer, as penalties, etc., in redemption of lands sold to the state for taxes. No claim is made for repayment of the taxes themselves. The lands affected by the sale are in Los Angeles County, and consist of a tract of land owned by Mrs. Lugarda A. de Palomares in the Rancho San Jose, and of two tracts elsewhere situated, owned by Concepcion de Avila and others. Both properties were assessed to Mrs. Palomares for the year 1895, but separately; and the following year the lands were sold to the state for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  4. People v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Henne v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Walker v. Alamo Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  4. Manby v. VoorheesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Brenner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API