Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1971No. Civ. 36217PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

A jury decided that defendant, an attorney, committed professional malpractice when, in 1963, he unsuccessfully defended plaintiff on a felony charge. As a result of his conviction plaintiff was imprisoned for about four years. Damages were fixed at $20,000. Defendant appeals.

Facts

During the night of November 25, 1962, plaintiff wanted to speak to his estranged wife, Wilma, over the telephone. She was then visiting Mr. and Mrs. Manuel D. Nelson at their home in the City of Gardena. Mr. Nelson, who took plaintiff’s call, told him that Wilma did not want to talk to him.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hughes v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Wright v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API