Legal Opinion

Nieves v. Vigolino

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1933No. Docket No. 8852PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order granting a new trial in an action for damages for death brought by plaintiffs as the heirs of the deceased. The main ground urged in the trial court in support of the motion for new trial was that the jury had been erroneously instructed.

This action involved a collision at a street intersection between an automobile driven by the deceased and an antomobile driven by respondent. The accident occurred after the effective date of the amendment of 1931 to section 113 of the California Vehicle Act. (Stats. 1931, p. 2120.) The evidence regarding the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Noble v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Pope v. WenischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Conroy v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Seimon v. Southern Pac. Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API