Legal Opinion

Noble v. Miles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1933No. Docket No. 4748PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This is an action by plaintiffs arising out of a collision between the automobile of plaintiffs and a truck belonging to certain of the defendants, and driven by Oftedal, also a defendant herein. The issues were submitted to a jury, who found for plaintiffs. The question of law involved as framed by appellants is, “Did the court commit prejudicial error in instructing the jury that the violation of any statute constituted negligence as a matter of law, without taking into consideration the amendment of section 113 (d) of the California Vehicle Act of 1931?”

The following instruction was given…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nile T. Deland v. Old Republic Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Box Pond Ass'n v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Collins v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Nieves v. VigolinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API