Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Nichols Research Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1993No. 1920567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Noah Jerome Hurst, appeals from a summary judgment for the defendants, Nichols Research Corporation ("the corporation") and its chief executive officer, Chris Horgen, in this action seeking damages for breach of contract and fraud. We affirm.

The material facts in this case are undisputed. In the fall of 1983, Hurst, a mechanical engineer, entered into employment negotiations with Horgen for a management position with the corporation, a Huntsville-based company that provides advanced technical services to various government agencies. Those negotiations focused primarily on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern States Ford, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Boland v. Fort Rucker Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. v. BiernbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Mayo v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Knight v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Moore v. Pennsylvania Castle Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Eubanks & Eubanks, Inc. v. Colonial Pacific LeasingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Bailey v. RowanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API