Legal Opinion

Moore v. Pennsylvania Castle Energy Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 31, 1996No. 95-6142PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

In this diversity case involving Alabama law, Pennsylvania Castle Energy Corporation (“Penn Castle”) appeals from a final judgment entered in the district court upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Gladys Moore. The issue raised by Penn Castle on appeal concerns the introduction of parol evidence to vary the terms of a written agreement, which Penn Castle claims is complete and unambiguous. The cross-appeal by Moore raises the issue of the dismissal of her claim for punitive damages.

Because we conclude that the district court erred in admitting the parol evidence,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Braten v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Thomas v. Principal Financial GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Faire Feaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Ex Parte Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Tropical Shipping & Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Coffin v. Bowater Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Carneiro Da Cunha v. Standard Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API