Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Andress

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 27, 1979No. 78-64PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented is whether certain statements and actions of the seller of real property may constitute a guarantee relating to the use of that property for which damages for the breach thereof may be recovered by the buyer. We find that where the seller refused to sign a proposed contract that guaranteed to the buyer that he could build apartments on the land, but orally assured the buyer, prior to the sale, that all the restrictions had been removed and that there was nothing standing in his way, the seller created a guarantee, the consideration for which was the purchase price of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Kubiszyn v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Greil Bros. v. MabsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Johnson-Rast & Hays, Inc. v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Financial Inv. v. Tukabatchee Area, Etc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Warrior Tombigbee Transportation Company, Inc. v. M/v Nan Fung Etc., John K. Irish, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Dykes v. Lane Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. v. BiernbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
  5. Bell v. South Cent. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API