Legal Opinion
State v. Rippley
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1982No. Cr. 815PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
Rippley appeals from a conviction on a charge of delivery of a controlled substance and from an order denying his motion to dismiss the prosecution. We affirm.
The parties have stipulated that the issue before this court is strictly one of law involving the question: whether or not the complaint should have been dismissed upon Rippley’s pretrial motion for dismissal attacking the constitutionality of § 19-03.1— 23(1), NDCC. The statute provides as follows:
“19-03.1 — 23. Prohibited acts A — Penalties.
“1. Except as authorized by this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Hagert v. Hatton Commodities, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RodriguezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.