Henning v. Cox
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Brought as a class suit by plaintiffs against defendants, claimed to be joint adventurers with them, the suit was to establish their claims to, and obtain the fruits of, described oil properties of the joint *587adventure. The claim of the suit was : (1) that plaintiffs and defendants were joint adventurers in the development of a block of oil leases; (2) that some of the defendants, though joint adventurers with plaintiffs and obligated to deal fairly with them, had unfairly and in breach of their trust gotten hold of the producing portions of the oil leases and were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Massachusetts v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Guettel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coastal Plains Development Corp. v. Micrea, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Hyman v. RegensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Franco Western Oil Co. v. FarissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Energy Fund of America, Inc. v. G. E. T. Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hyman v. RegensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.