Legal Opinion

United States v. Gleason

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 28, 1994No. ACMR 8803009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CREAN, Senior Judge:

This ease has taken a long and arduous journey through the military justice system. It is a tale more appropriate for soldiers of fortune than soldiers of the United States Army. Emotions in the appellant’s unit ran so high, both for and against him, that there were significant unlawful command influence issues that required extensive judicial hearings, thousands of pages in the record of trial, and two separate command investigations.

The appellant was tried by a general court-martial1, composed of officer members, for soliciting another to commit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. RoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. DickeyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. GleasonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API