Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Gleason

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 27, 1995No. 94-1040; CMR No. 8803009PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Senior Judge:

1. The “long and arduous journey [of this case] through the military justice system”1 began with Sergeant Major Gleason’s trial by a general court-martial with officer members sitting in Okinawa. The charges were violation of Army Regulation 600-50 by having a *71financial conflict of interest, solicitation to commit murder, and communication of a threat, in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 892 and 934, respectively. To the charge that he had solicited another to murder Captain Dumpson, Gleason pleaded not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. United States v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. United States v. Specialist JOSHUA D. CHANDLERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  4. United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. McDonaldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API