Legal Opinion

United States v. Gleason

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 14, 1997No. ARMY 8803009Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW.

GONZALES, Judge.

A general court-martial, composed of officer members, convicted the appellant of violating Army Regulation 600-50 (having a financial conflict of interest) [hereinafter AR 600-50] and soliciting another to murder a commissioned officer in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. On 29 January 1989, the convening authority, after a rehearing on the sentence, approved the adjudged sentence consisting of confinement for seven years, forfeiture of all *885pay and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. HigginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. GleasonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API