Legal Opinion

Ruckman v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided October 20, 1998No. 2499972PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Judge.

Maynard F. Ruckman, Jr. was convicted in a bench trial for obstruction of justice in violation of Code § 18.2-460(A). On appeal, Ruckman contends the evidence is insufficient to prove that he knowingly obstructed a law enforcement officer in the performance of his duties. We agree and reverse the conviction.

Code § 18.2-460(A) provides, in pertinent part, that “[i]f any person without just cause knowingly obstructs ... any law enforcement officer in the performance of his duties or refuses without just cause to cease such obstruction when requested to do so by such ... law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Derr v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  2. Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Jonathan Rogers v. M. L. Pendleton, Officer M. G. Vinyard, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  2. Michael Thomas Wilson v. Barry A. Kittoe, and Anthony S. TokachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. Lauren Graham v. C. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. Jose Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. Brown v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API