Legal Opinion
Jonathan Rogers v. M. L. Pendleton, Officer M. G. Vinyard, Officer
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2001No. 00-2130PublishedCited by 204 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Jonathan Rogers brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp.2000) against Officers M.L. Pen-dleton and M.G. Vinyard of the Roanoke, Va. Police Department (“the officers”), alleging that the officers violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution by falsely arresting him, unreasonably assaulting him, falsely imprisoning him, and maliciously prosecuting him. The officers appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. For the reasons set forth below, we…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by204 opinions
- Occupy Columbia v. Nikki HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Amanda Smith v. R. RayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Estate Robert Smith v. MarascoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Nicole Haberle v. Daniel TroxellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Tiffanie Hupp v. State Trooper Seth CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.