State v. Tenbusch
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Defendant was charged with two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the second degree. ORS 163.425; ORS 163.415. The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing defendant’s self-incriminating statements. The state argues that the trial court erred in concluding that defendant’s statements were involuntary. We reverse and remand.
In an earlier case, defendant pleaded guilty to sexually abusing his stepson and was placed on probation. Two conditions of his probation were:
“9. The defendant shall engage in sexual offender treatment with a mental health…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Phata SaechaoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Redwine v. STARBOARD, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.