Legal Opinion
Hoogovens Staal BV v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 13, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-27. Court No. 96-10-02394PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DiCARLO, Senior Judge.
This matter is before the Court under USCIT Rule 56.2 on separate motions for judgment on the agency record brought by Hoogovens Staal BV and Hoogovens Steel USA, Inc. (collectively “Hoogovens”) and by AK Steel Corporation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Inland Steel Industries, Inc., LTV Steel Company, Inc., National Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group (a unit of USX Corporation) (collectively “AK Steel”). The parties challenge aspects of the Commerce Department’s final determination of the first administrative review in Certain Coldr-Rolled Carbon…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mannesmannrohren-Werke AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Hoogovens Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- U.S. Steel Group-A Unit of USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.