State v. Ornelas
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Appellant Francisco Ornelas challenges the revocation of his probation on a 1994 third-degree criminal sexual conduct conviction. Ornelas’s probation was revoked for having unsupervised contact with a minor. The question presented is whether the district court abused its discretion when it revoked Ornelas’s probation and executed the 48-month prison sentence imposed but stayed at the time of the conviction. A divided court of appeals affirmed the district court. State v. Ornelas, No. C4-02-1693, 2003 WL 1818011, at *2 (Minn.App. Apr.8, 2003). In this appeal, *76Ornelas argues…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- United States v. John Andrew DaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Boitnott v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Pageau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael NowackiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Darren Lee WhitelowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.