Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 2008No. A06-2166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

In this appeal from an order revoking probation imposed for appellant’s 2001 conviction of first-degree assault, appellant argues that the district court erred in revoking his probation because the district court based its decision on its belief that Minn.Stat. § 609.135, subd. 4 (2006), precluded it from sentencing appellant to additional jail time when appellant had already served more than a year of probationary jail time. Because the district court’s interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 609.135, subd. 4, was erroneous, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

On May 4,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. HarlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Hector Martinez v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. James Brandon PonthieuxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API