State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
In this appeal from an order revoking probation imposed for appellant’s 2001 conviction of first-degree assault, appellant argues that the district court erred in revoking his probation because the district court based its decision on its belief that Minn.Stat. § 609.135, subd. 4 (2006), precluded it from sentencing appellant to additional jail time when appellant had already served more than a year of probationary jail time. Because the district court’s interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 609.135, subd. 4, was erroneous, we reverse and remand for resentencing.
FACTS
On May 4,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. HarlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Hector Martinez v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. James Brandon PonthieuxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008