State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Nowacki
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAUBER, Judge.
In this probation-revocation appeal, appellant argues that the district court’s finding that he violated the terms of his probation was an abuse of discretion because the district court improperly considered references to appellant’s failed polygraph examination. We agree that-the district court abused its discretion by permitting references of appellant’s failed polygraph examinations at the revocation hearing, but we affirm because, on this record, the error was harmless.
FACTS
In February 2010, appellant Chad No-wacki pleaded guilty to third-degree criminal sexual…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.