Legal Opinion

State v. Kerfoot

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 10, 1992No. 91-226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case involves the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA). Ernest and Nora Kerfoot obtained a divorce in Oklahoma in 1981, and Nora was awarded custody of their two children. Ernest Kerfoot, appellee, was ordered to pay child support in the amount of $400.00 per month, which amount was reduced to $250.00 per month in 1982. Appellee moved to and now resides in Arkansas, and Nora changed her residence to Texas, where she became a recipient of Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Under RURESA, specifically Ark. Code Ann. § 9-14-308 and -314…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Todd v. PochopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kline v. KlineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Iowa ex rel. Iowa Department of Social Services v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Scinta v. MarkwardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lichtenstein v. BarbanelKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Chaisson v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. JEFFERSON CTY. CHILD SUPPORT v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API