Legal Opinion

Lichtenstein v. Barbanel

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2010No. 2008-SC-000661-DGPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice SCOTT.

This case involves Steven J. Lichtenstein’s appeal of two Income Withholding Orders of the Jefferson Family Court which require garnishment of his wages under two separate orders: (1) for child support arrearage, spousal support arrear-age, medical care, insurance reimbursement, and attorney’s fees; and (2) for Roberta Lichtenstein Barbanal’s monetary share of the marital property and reimbursement for a marital debt that she paid.

Steven now contends that the family court abused its discretion, or violated his right to due process, when it entered the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Jackson Energy Cooperative Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. MPM Financial Group, Inc. v. MortonKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kuprion v. FitzgeraldKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Richardson v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beth Lewis Maze & Unknown Similarly Situated Purchasers Contracts v. Bd. of Dirs. for the Commonwealth Postsecondary Educ. Prepaid Tuition Trust FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Seeger v. LanhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. O'Neill v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Overstreet v. Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd. PartnershipKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. OCS/Pappas v. O'Brien and Bernheim v. PappasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API