Legal Opinion
Chaisson v. Ragsdale
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 12, 1996No. 95-945PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant Roy Chaisson appeals from part of an order which (1) grants appellee Annette Ragsdale a setoff against the child support award for a debt she paid following the divorce, and (2) grants visitation rights. Annette Ragsdale did not file an appellee’s brief. We reverse that part of the chancellor’s order which grants the setoff and visitation rights.
On May 2, 1982, Roy Chaisson and Annette Chaisson (now Ragsdale) 1 were married. Two children, William Roy Chaisson and David Scott Chaisson, were born of that marriage. On October 6, 1988, the couple divorced in New…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Macy v. MacyWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Todd v. PochopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- JEFFERSON CTY. CHILD SUPPORT v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Iowa ex rel. Iowa Department of Social Services v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- State v. KerfootSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. BarbanelKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Harbison v. JohnstonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- OCS/Pappas v. O'Brien and Bernheim v. PappasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Stanley v. BouzaglouNew York City Family Court · 2002
- Weekley v. WeekleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.