Appeal of Sutton
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The petitioner, Tammy M. Sutton, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) denying her request for medical benefits for psychological counseling following a work-related injury. We affirm.
The parties do not dispute the following facts. In 1992, the petitioner was employed by respondent Lucas Industries, Inc. In April 1992, she touched a door handle upon which a lubricant or glue had been sprayed and subsequently touched her left eye. After she *349felt a painful burning sensation in her eye, the petitioner sought treatment at a local emergency room. She received…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of GamasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Tzimas v. Coiffures ex rel. MichaelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Appeal of StetsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- In re SpragueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blagbrough Family Realty Trust v. a & T Forest Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Appeal of Dean FoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In re FaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of WingateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- In re N.H. Elec. Coop., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.