Legal Opinion

Upton v. Adams' Executors

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1867PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Bartholomew Common. Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtErazer, J.

This was a suit by the appellees against the appellant and one Bane, upon a promissory note purporting to have been made by the defendants and others, and payable to the testator. Bane did not answer, and judgment was rendered against him by default. ■ Upton answered in abatement, that the plaintiffs were not executors, &c., appointed under the laws of this State, and if appointed elsewhere, had never filed an authenticated copy of their letters testamentary in the court where the suit was pending. This answer was, on motion of the plaintiffs, stricken out as frivolous. He then answered in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Asher's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spencer v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pea v. PeaIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Estate of Hofgesang v. HansfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Walker v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API