Legal Opinion

Martin v. Asher's Administrator

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Common Pleas,

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This was a suit by Martin, the appellant, against Ghinoweth, as administrator of Edmund Asher, deceased, and Benjamin T. Duncan, on a lost note, alleged to have been executed by Asher, in his lifetime, to Duncan.

The facts, as we gather them from an imperfect and extremely confused record, are as follows: That Asher, on the 1st of September, 1849, executed a promissory note to Duncan for the sum of $200, payable on the 25th of December of the same year. After Asher’s death, Duncan, claiming that the original note was lost, furnished a copy of it, and made to Martin, the plaintiff, the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Bank of Wheatland v. Bagley Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Noble v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Belton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Stanford v. StanfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Upton v. Adams' ExecutorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API