Legal Opinion

Maddy v. National Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1923No. 23,510PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendant a balance claimed to be due under a policy issued by the American Bonding & Casualty Company insuring her against disability caused by illness. The trial court found as a fact that defendant “for a valuable consideration, assumed as of twelve o’clock noon, June 1, 1920, said contract of insurance as its own and agreed with said plaintiff that it would perform all the obligations thereof in the place and stead of the American Bonding and Casualty Company,” and directed judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appealed from an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Hekla Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Hanson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Bell v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Cornwell v. MeginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Johnson v. RumseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Epland v. Meade Insurance Agency Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Shiflet v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. County of Lyon v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. UtneDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API