Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Utne
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
This a non-jury diversity action to recover amounts allegedly due and owing plaintiff on five promissory notes executed by defendant. The substantive law of Minnesota controls disposition.
Plaintiff is The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania-corporation. Defendant is a citizen of Minnesota. The complaint alleges that while defendant was a general agent of plaintiff, the plaintiff made several loans of money totaling $20,500.00 to defendant in return for which defendant made, executed and delivered to plaintiff five promissory notes. Dui'ing the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frank v. IrgensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Strickland v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Morrison v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Hogan v. Church of St. AnneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Maddy v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Estate of FauskeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993