Legal Opinion

Boettger v. Miklich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1993No. 35 Middle District Appeal Docket 1992PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*584 OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth Court, 142 Pa.Cmwlth. 136, 599 A.2d 713 properly interpreted the parameters of the “good faith defense” to a civil action as provided in section 5725(c) of the Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.1 For the reasons that follow, we find that the Commonwealth Court improperly expanded the good faith defense in violation of the clear language of the statute, and accordingly, reverse the order and opinion of that Court.

The relevant facts are that the appellees (defendants below)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. HashemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Kopko v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Degenhardt v. Dillon Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Karoly v. MancusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API