Commonwealth v. Hashem
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allocatur in the present case to determine, as a question of first impression, the specific requirements governing the use of information intercepted under the provisions of the Wiretap Act, 18 Pa.C.S. § 5701 et seq., when the crime alleged is different from the targeted criminal activity that formed the basis for the original intercept order. Upon the facts of record and for the reasons following, we are constrained to reverse the Order of the Superior Court, 363 Pa.Super. Ill, 525 A.2d 744, which affirmed the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Isadore MarionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Boettger v. LoverroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HashemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- United States v. Salvatore A. Williams, A/K/A "Sonny." United States of America v. Salvatore C. Williams, A/K/A "Sal." United States of America v. Adolph Williams, A/K/A "Junior."Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Kopko v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Boettger v. MiklichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.