Legal Opinion

Keith Russell v. Citigroup, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2014No. 13-5994PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

When Keith Russell accepted a job with Citicorp Credit Services, he agreed to arbitrate “all employment-related disputes” with the company. Does that mean he must arbitrate a case already pending in court when he signed the agreement? We think not.

I

From 2004 to 2009, Russell worked at Citicorp’s call center in Florence, Kentucky. As a condition of employment, he signed a standard contract to arbitrate his disputes with the company. The agreement covered individual claims but not class actions.

In January 2012, Russell filed a class action against the company. He…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  5. Frear v. P.T.A. Industries, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Alwert v. Cox Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Phyllis Davis v. Echo Valley Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. Borror Property Mgmt v. Oro Karric NorthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Richard E. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API