Legal Opinion

New York v. Ametek, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 18, 2007No. 05 CIV.2186 SCRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, the State of New York, brought this action against Defendants Ametek Inc. (“Ametek”) and M. Argueso & Co. Inc., (“Argueso”) for recovery of costs pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., and for state law claims of restitution and public nuisance. Plaintiff seeks to recover costs incurred by the State in responding to the release of hazardous substances at the Mamaroneck Taylor’s Lane Compost Site in the Village of Mamaroneck, West-chester…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  2. New York v. West Side Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. Ashtabula River Corp. Group II v. Conrail, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  4. Town of Halfmoon v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2015
  5. MPM Silicones, LLC v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API