Legal Opinion

Eidson v. Arenas

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 10, 1993No. 93-1337-Civ-T-17BPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for a Judgment of Default, and on Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

I. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

This Court has wide discretion in determining whether a judgment of default should be entered when a defendant fails to timely answer.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Quintiles Transnational Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
  2. Cohen v. WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  3. Hamilton Products, Inc. v. O'NeillDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API