Legal Opinion

People v. Schmidt

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1960No. Crim. 6841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of violating Penal Code, section 337a, subdivision 6 (accepting a bet). His motion for a new trial was denied. He has appealed from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion.

On November 11, 1958, Officer Bovensiep, of the Los Angeles Police Department, received from Sergeant Cohen a telephone number, address, and apartment number, together with information that bookmaking was being carried on at said address. Officers Bovensiep and Riegel were instructed to check on the activities that were being conducted at such location. The address was 2016…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. DurazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. MelodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. WarnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. HudakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. TappanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API