Legal Opinion

People v. Durazo

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1959No. Crim. 6427PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

By an indictment in three counts, defendant was charged with selling heroin in violation of section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code. He was tried by the court and found guilty on counts two and three. This appeal is taken from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Defendant contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to require a prosecution witness to divulge the name of an informer on cross-examination. Our review of the record convinces us that this contention must be sustained.

The case was submitted upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. CastielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Spataro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. People v. KiihoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API