Legal Opinion

People v. Hudak

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1957No. Crim. 5742PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, defendant was charged in three counts with violations of Penal Code, section 337a. Count I alleged a violation of subdivision 1 of the foregoing statute in that defendant was engaged-in “pool selling and bookmaking.” Count II alleged a violation of subdivision 2 in that defendant kept and occupied an apartment for the purpose of recording and registering bets. In Count III defendant was accused of a violation of subdivision 4 in that he recorded and registered bets. The information also alleged a prior conviction of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Willson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BoylesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. KilvingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. RabaleteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. RaysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. SakelarisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API