Legal Opinion

United States v. Lorenzo Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1993No. 92-10285PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Lorenzo Garcia appeals his jury conviction for aggravated sexual abuse of a child. He requests that his conviction be vacated and his ease remanded for a new trial, arguing (1) that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by allowing the minor victim to testify at trial via two-way closed circuit television, and (2) that the district court erroneously refused to instruct the jury regarding abusive sexual contact as a lesser-included offense of aggravated sexual abuse. We find these arguments without merit and we affirm.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold GrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Manuel Jesus TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Douglas DemarriasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. Jose Abonce-BarreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Anita YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Lopez QuinteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. State of Iowa v. Zachariah J. RogersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API