United States v. Lorenzo Garcia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Lorenzo Garcia appeals his jury conviction for aggravated sexual abuse of a child. He requests that his conviction be vacated and his ease remanded for a new trial, arguing (1) that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by allowing the minor victim to testify at trial via two-way closed circuit television, and (2) that the district court erroneously refused to instruct the jury regarding abusive sexual contact as a lesser-included offense of aggravated sexual abuse. We find these arguments without merit and we affirm.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold GrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Manuel Jesus TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Douglas DemarriasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. Jose Abonce-BarreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Anita YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lopez QuinteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State of Iowa v. Zachariah J. RogersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.