Legal Opinion
United States v. Anita Yates
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 13, 2006No. 02-13654PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
The court took this case en banc to consider whether witness testimony presented on a television monitor at a criminal trial in Montgomery, Alabama, by live, two-way video conference with witnesses in Australia, violated the Defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against them. Holding that it did, we vacate the convictions and remand for a new trial.
I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Anton Pusztai and Anita Yates (“Defendants”) were tried in the Middle District of Alabama for mail fraud, conspiracy to de*1310fraud the United States, conspiracy to commit money…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Democratic Executive Committee of Florida v. Laurel M. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Laron CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- State v. T. MercierMontana Supreme Court · 2021
- City of Missoula v. DuaneMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Lipsitz v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.