State v. Carter
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
In this criminal proceeding, the state appeals from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. We are called on to address whether a search warrant that authorizes a search, but fails to authorize a seizure, provides police with legal authority to execute the search described in the warrant, so that items encountered during the search and immediately recognized as contraband or evidence of a crime may lawfully be seized under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement. The trial court held that such a warrant is invalid on its face because it does not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BellarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. CurrinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Efimoff v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch of Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.