Legal Opinion

State v. Bellar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 2009No. 050230673; A129493PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*82EDMONDS, P. J.

The appeal in this criminal case charging defendant with 40 counts of encouraging child sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.686, was initiated by the state after the trial court allowed in part and denied in part defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Defendant cross-appeals pursuant to ORS 138.0401 from the part of the order denying the motion to suppress. Subsequently, the state dismissed its appeal. The threshold issue before us is whether, under ORS 138.040, we may exercise our discretion to consider defendant’s cross-appeal after the state has dismissed its appeal.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of Application for Search WarrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. State v. MansorWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. In Re Appeal of Application for Search WarrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. State v. BellarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API