Legal Opinion

Ryle v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1925No. 15631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. “If the fact of suretyship does not appear on the face of the contract, it may be proved by parol either before or after the judgment (the creditor not being delayed in his remedy by such collateral issue between the principal and his surety), if before judgment the surety shall give notice to the principal of his intention to make such proof.” Civil Code (1910), § 3556. The record shows that notice of such intention was given to the principal in the instant case. If such a surety “is by an erroneous ruling denied the right to establish before judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hancock v. Empire Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Whitley v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Thompson v. Bank of ChatsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Atlanta National Bank v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Crawford v. Citizens & Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovelady v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Reeves v. Progressive Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Van Norden v. AUTO CREDIT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API