Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter superior court. July 23, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

An action upon a promissory note was brought in the court below by W. B. Hudson, as surviving partner of L. N. Hudson & Brother, against Mrs. S. E. Clegg and C. R. Whitley. The latter signed the note apparently as principal. Mrs. Clegg filed a plea of non est factum. Whitley, among other things, set up that he was only a surety upon the note sued on, and prayed that in the event of a recovery by the plaintiff, the fact of suretyship be established by the judgment. There was a verdict for the plaintiff against both defendants. Each made a separate motion for a new trial, and the bill of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ChampionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Killian v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Chamblee v. DavieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loewenherz v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Bishop v. Georgia National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Duggan v. MonkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Hardy v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Rogers v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API