Thompson v. Bank of Chatsworth
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Murray superior court — Judge Tarver. August 19, 1922.
1Opinion of the CourtBbtx, J.
1. That a person whose name appears as the maker óf a negotiable note “ signed and delivered it merely as an accommodation maker, without filling various blanks therein, and with the understanding that the person to whom he delivered it might thereafter fill the blanks and insert a certain amount and use the note for that person’s benefit, but only in the event that the signer should thereafter consent to the completion of the note and to its use, and that thereafter a larger amount was inserted and the note used without his knowledge or consent, would not . . constitute a valid defense…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Baggett v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Planters Cotton Oil Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Bonner v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Joseph v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ayers v. John B. Daniel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Gwinnett Commercial Bank v. FlakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Moore v. Standard Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Myers v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.