Legal Opinion
Van Norden v. AUTO CREDIT COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 26, 1964No. 40356PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
There is no proper assignment of error on the direction of a verdict, Moody v. Southern R. Co., 14 Ga. App. 258 (80 SE 911), and there is no assignment of error upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial which thus becomes the law of the case. The question of whether the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, or to demand the verdict as directed, is accordingly not before us for decision.
A single instrument containing a conditional sale contract and note is held in Georgia, contrary to the rule in many States, to be a negotiable instrument 1 within the purview of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cook v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Moody v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Howard v. TRUSCO FINANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Williams v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Roberson v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Geiger Finance Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971