Legal Opinion

Elgin American Mfg. Co. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1936No. Patent Appeal 3637PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences dismissing appellant’s notice of opposition and holding that appellee was entitled to the registration of its trademark for use on soap.

Appellee’s mark is in the form of a monogram, and, although it supposedly consists of the letters “EA,” it will be observed that the letter “A” is so formed that it also constitutes the letter “M.”

Appellant’s mark consists of the letters “EAM.”

For the purpose of clarity, we reproduce the marks of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. HartogensisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Crystal Corporation v. Manhattan Chemical Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Helen Schy-Man-Ski & Sons v. S. S. S. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Globe Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Elgin American Mfg. Co. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  4. G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. Cofax Corporation (Three Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Elgin American Mfg. Co. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API