G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. Cofax Corporation (Three Cases)
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
There are here three appeals from decisions of the Commissioner of Patents rendered by him in three opposition proceedings. The goods involved consist of certain office supplies. One appeal is from the commissioner’s decision, 77 U.S.P.Q. 329, in opposition No. 24,197, where the identical mark “Pax” was used on the goods by both parties; the other appeals are from the commissioner’s decision, 77 U.S.P.Q. 331, in oppositions Nos. 24,665 and 24,666, where the basic feature of the mark “Pax” was incorporated in appellee’s two marks, “Paxite” and “Paxomat,” and used in the sale…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- John Wood Mfg. Co. v. Servel, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Elgin American Mfg. Co. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Three in One Oil Co. v. St. Louis Rubber Cement Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myers v. Polk Miller Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- F. Jacobson & Sons, Inc. v. Jaybern Fabrics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Irma Hosiery Co. v. SchulmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Irma Hosiery Co. v. SchulmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Lightnin Chemical Co. v. Royal Home Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.